Iterative Task Performer

Concept

The Iterative Task Performer embodies the loop-based nature of intelligent work. Unlike deterministic, one-shot automation, this agent mirrors how humans solve complex tasks: through successive drafts, feedback loops, and progressive refinement.
In Software 3.0, this capability is crucial. LLMs do not generate perfect outputs on the first attempt — and they shouldn’t be expected to. Instead, this agent treats every generation as a proposal subject to further optimization, critique, or revision.
It formalizes trial-and-error within software, making iteration a first-class architecture feature.

Functional Logic

The agent's structure revolves around the loop — of prompt → output → review → modify → re-output. It may operate:

• With a Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) — User gives explicit feedback, selects versions, or scores results
• Autonomously — Agent evaluates its own outputs via critique chains, error detection modules, or scoring functions
• Tool-Augmented — Uses validators, external APIs, or reference data to judge correctness and completeness

It integrates:

• Memory Persistence — Retains previous attempts and tracks changes across revisions
• Heuristic Search — Applies different prompt templates or sub-task decompositions based on past performance
• Goal Definition — Aligns task output with a success condition or user objective
• Stopping Criteria — Based on confidence threshold, approval, or convergence detection

This logic supports outputs that evolve over time — from raw stubs to polished deliverables.

Software Enabled

Iterative task agents enable systems that never settle for the first try. Use cases include:

• Autonomous Writers — Blog posts, research summaries, and reports developed via multi-round drafts
• Multi-Pass Coders — Agents that write code, test it, self-debug, and refine
• Design Generators — UI or UX prototypes generated in cycles, each incorporating critique
• Research Synthesizers — LLMs that gather info, generate insights, and then refine based on new context
• QA Feedback Loops — Agents that revise customer service replies, marketing copy, or analysis until it passes brand tone, logic, and accuracy checks

It also changes how products are designed: instead of delivering “finished” features, systems become collaborative layers — where every function is subject to refinement through machine reasoning or user prompting.

‍